Yesterday’s guardian reported that the Chameleon declared to the House of Commons that “the deal” he has pretended to negotiate is legally binding.
The saddest thing about today’s article is that very very few of our Readers will be in any way surprised by the title of today’s article and the content which demonstrates that a man who holds the officer of Prime Minister of the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland has told a barefaced lie.
But then, this organ’s readers know the Chameleon “has form” – indeed he has stood in front of his sovereign lady, Her Majesty the Queen, and with bible in hand has taken the Most Solemn Oath of Privy Councillor to defend the Queen’s Majesty – in the knowledge that he has no intention of keeping this oath as he co-operates with the unlawful government of Her Majesty’s realm by a foreign power, the European Union.
Clearly then, we cannot expect this TRAITOR to speak the truth to us!
The FACT is that the Chameleon LIED to the House of Commons when he said the deal he has been handed by this country’s rulers is to be legally binding.
The FACT is that none of the signatories could guarantee the passage of ANY treaty amendment and, even if they were to secure the amendments, none could guarantee their ratification in this context, because the Vienna Convention on the Law of Treaties (Article 61) applies. This states:
“A party may invoke the impossibility of performing a treaty as a ground for terminating or withdrawing from it if the impossibility results from the permanent disappearance or destruction of an object indispensable for the execution of the treaty.”
The “object indispensable for the execution of the treaty” in this case is an amended treaty which, if it does not materialise, renders the Chameleon’s settlement unenforceable. It is therefore NOT legally binding AND NOT irreversible.
SECONDLY: The original settlement – the agreement by heads of government &C., acting as an intergovernmental body, are outside the framework of the EU treaties. However, amendments to the EU treaty require actions by the European Council, legally an entirely separate body, and the European Parliament.
At this point the dictum, “res inter alios acta vel iudicata, aliis nec nocet nec prodocet” applies (two or more people cannot agree amongst each other to establish an obligation for a third party who was not involved in the agreement). This is translated into treaty law by Article 34 of the Vienna Convention, which states that “a treaty does not create either obligations or rights for a third State without its consent”.
Therefore NO agreement can be binding if it’s execution depends on something outside the control of the parties making that agreement, rendering it impossible to deliver, and then no parties to a treaty can bind a third party to its provisions, without their consent (which the EU is not in a position to give).
Therefore, FOR THE AVOIDANCE OF DOUBT the British Gazette restates:
Mr Cameron. You are a liar.