• L’brexit: L’acte final!


    Above, the Royal Opera House, Covent Garden.

    In several previous posts stretching over the past three years, the BG has described the Brexit Saga as “un grand coup de théâtre.” Well, it seems that we are approaching “L’acte final!”
    In his blog-post today (http://eureferendum.com/blogview.aspx?blogno=87369), Doctor Richard North again calls it out and today, states what increasingly has become “the patently obvious” – that HMG intends that “the negotiations” fail and that the blame can be placed (by HMG) on the “intransigence of Brussels and the EU bureaucrats”. This will of course play to a tune that has been played for many years by the English (not Scottish) tabloid press.

    This of course begs the question: “Does HMG actually WANT a no deal Brexit?”

    The answer? “Probably not!”

    This because the consequences of a no deal Brexit will be most severe and no amount of “spin” generated by Mr Dominic Cummings will be able to disguise this.

    You see, for those (in power) putting forward the idea that, “No Deal is No Problem” – No Deal very much IS a problem!

    You see, those ordinary people who are Brexit Party subscribers and UKIP members who hold up placards with these words of nonsense upon them actually DO believe that No Deal is No Problem!
    And there of course, is the problem!
    Therefore what is becoming increasingly clear is this: That the Buffoon’s Brexit strategy requires not only the EU to refuse an A50 extension and to put in place the plank leading to a no deal Brexit – It also requires a majority of MPs in the House of Commons to vote out HMG via a No Confidence Motion and to (after a period of turmoil where Comrade Corbyn desperately tries to become Prime Minister) put in place a new minority government which – if the time to a no deal Brexit is measured in days – to do two things: Revoke Article 50 using the Royal Prerogative and to vote for a General Election!

    The forthcoming general election campaign may come to be known by future historians as “the Cut Throat Election” – this after the “cut throat” strategy occasionally adopted by defendants in a criminal trail where each blames the other for the crime committed!

    What this means is this: the Brexit Party and UKIP will after the election continue to hanker after Brexit claiming that those dastardly Remainers and Remainiacs “stole Brexit” and “betrayed” the British People and that had not the treasonous “Emergency Government” “surrendered” to the EU by revoking Article 50 then the sunny uplands of the “clean break” Nirvana of “trading on WTO terms” would have followed like night follows day!

    Of course, the British People WERE betrayed. They were promised a Brexit that could NEVER have been delivered.

    The ONLY Brexit that it is possible to deliver is described – in detail – below:
    GOTO: http://www.eureferendum.com/documents/flexcit.pdf
    This of course is something the BG has stated TIME AND TIME AGAIN!

    At this point, many patriots will be distressed and declare: “ALL IS LOST!”

    The BG would counsel against such despair!

    True, the vote to Leave was betrayed and the UK remains in the EU. But the cost of victory (to the EU) has been high! Wars – even bloodless, non violent ones such as the Brexit Crisis – have costs to both victor and vanquished alike. British Patriots must take heart by recognising the following FACTS which will be recorded by history and read long after the Editor of the BG and his readers are dead.

    These are:

    ~ That on Thursday 23rd June 2016, the British People voted to leave the European Union of the Cities and the Regions.

    ~ That, as Mr Nigel Farage (the leader of the Brexit Party) and Mr Richard Braine (the leader of UKIP) state: The result was unqualified. It did not state leave after a negotiation, or leave to “a Norway type arrangement”. The vote was to LEAVE.

    ~ That the UK’s membership of the EU REMAINS unlawful due to the breaches of the 1688/1689 Declaration/Bill of Rights, the Privy Council Oath and the Coronation Oath Act, 1953

    ~ That the use of the Royal Prerogative to revoke A50 is unlawful due breach of the 1688/1689 Declaration/Bill of Rights which decrees that ANY act of the sovereign that has the effect of amending, suspending, making or repealing LAW – REQUIRES the consent of Parliament. In other words, a revocation of Article 50 would require an Act of Parliament!

    ~ That the European Union of the Cities and the Regions will have been gravely damaged by this disaster.
    Conclusion: Those who apply to themselves the term “Brexiteer” can and should find satisfaction in the FACT that their patriotic efforts have wounded the beast that is the European Union of the Cities and the Regions. That is no little thing! Indeed, one can speculate that the wound thus delivered will fester and as such will spread and cause sickness to the Brussels body politic.

    Write a comment