• Register of Electors: A means of protest.

      3 comments

    Every year one receives through the post a form which the law requires you to complete: the Register of Electors. Attached is an explanatory form that urges you to complete the form. Attached is an explanatory form that explains how to complete the form and also statement encouraging you to excise the franchise – “It’s your vote – use it don’t lose it.”

    The form also seeks to encourage you to register via the internet or telephone or even by text message as they don’t want you to send the form back through the post using the second class reply paid envelope provided to save costs.

    The British Gazette however suggests that you send the form back via the post using the envelope provided but attach a letter advising them of the fact that lawful government has ceased in this country and as MISPRISON OF TREASON is an offence under the Common Law of England and Wales, you are under a lawful duty to report all cases of treason.

    The text of the letter is below. Please feel free to copy and paste.

    The Manager,
    Electoral Services
    [address]

    Date:

    Dear Sir,

    Re: Register of Electors [year]

    Please find enclosed the completed form duly signed and dated.

    I have sent this form back to you as the form states that I have a legal requirement to do so. However, could you please note the following:

    The form includes the phrase, “It’s your vote – use it don’t lose it.” This is a clear invitation to exercise the franchise. There appears to be a problem however. Ever since the enactment of the European Communities Act of 1972 and particularly the case since the Treaty of Lisbon has been ratified by the UK, there appears to be a fundamental conflict of law. I draw your attention to the Coronation Oath Act of 1953 in which Our Sovereign Lady, Queen Elizabeth the Second, by the Grace of God, of the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland appears to have breached her Coronation Oath, as pertaining to “….governing us [the British People] according to our [the British People] laws and customs….”

    Furthermore, the Prime Minister, his colleagues, and previous Prime Ministers and their colleagues appear to have breached their own oaths given upon being raised to the Privy Council whereby they:
    “….do swear by Almighty God to be a true and faithful Servant unto The Queen’s Majesty as one of Her Majesty’s Privy Council. You will not know or understand of any manner of thing to be attempted, done or spoken against Her Majesty’s Person, Honour, Crown or Dignity Royal, but you will lett and withstand the same to the uttermost of your power, and either cause it to be revealed to Her Majesty Herself, or to such of Her Privy Council as shall advertise Her Majesty of the same. You will in all things to be moved, treated and debated in Council, faithfully and truly declare your Mind and Opinion, according to your Heart and Conscience; and will keep secret all matters committed and revealed unto you, or that shall be treated of secretly in Council. And if any of the said Treaties or Counsels shall touch any of the Counsellors you will not reveal it unto him but will keep the same until such time as, by the consent of Her Majesty or of the Council, Publication shall be made thereof. You will to your uttermost bear Faith and Allegiance to the Queen’s Majesty; and will assist and defend all Jurisdictions, Pre-eminences, and Authorities, granted to Her Majesty and annexed to the Crown by Acts of Parliament, or otherwise, against all Foreign Princes, Persons, Prelates, States, or Potentates. And generally in all things you will do as a faithful and true Servant ought to do to Her Majesty so help you God….”

    Both these appear to be a contravention of the terms of the perpetual treaty, “The Declaration of Rights” 1688 which was ratified into law by the provisions of the Bill of Rights in 1689., viz: “That the pretended Power of Suspending of Laws or the Execution of Laws by Regall Authority without Consent of Parlyament is illegall.”

    As “Misprision of Treason” is an offence under the common law of England and Wales I am clearly under a lawful duty to disclose to you the above and formerly report to you that TREASON appears to have taken place and further to draw your attention to the fact that the aforementioned advice (It’s your vote – use it don’t lose it) does not contain a rider stating that a person who wishes to exercise the franchise should only vote for candidates who support lawful constitutional government in the UK.

    Please advise me of what action you are going to take.

    Yours faithfully,

    [Name and address]

    • Brilliant!
      Does that imply failure to take action, according to Legem Terrae’ renders both local and national elections invalid?

      Under what authority did the government’s employee, Lord Judge, remove the right to trial by jury – an act which in itself is a crime according to our British Constitution?

    • I love looking through an article that will make men and women think. Also, many thanks for permitting me to comment!

    • It is my understanding that statutes (the lowest form of law) require consent. If i do not consent to be forced to ‘legally’ complete any form, then that is my right surely? Legal is not lawful, and nobody can believe recent Westminster administrations have any claim to be lawful.

      Yours

    Write a comment